X

Personal Injury Attorney Rejects Insurance Company’s “Rules” For Assessing Injury

Maryland Personal Injury Attorney  Jonathan Carroll represented a client at trial who had delayed getting therapy following an accident because she was afraid of doctors. The insurance company lawyer tried to argue that this “gap” in treatment meant that Carroll’s client was not actually hurt in the accident. Carroll argued to the Court that everyone acts differently following an accident that and that the insurance company was trying make up specific “rules” for how every accident victim should behave following an accident. The Court agreed with Carroll and awarded his client most of her medical bills as well as an additional sum for pain and suffering. The Court’s award was several thousand dollars more than the insurance company’s pretrial offer.

Every case is different. If you have questions about the value of your case, call the personal injury attorneys at Jezic and Moyse, LLC.

Jezic & Moyse:
Related Post